Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Naughty Dog’s Response to Ellie’s Sexuality: “Who Cares?”

After Ellie kissed Riley in the Left Behind DLC, people had lots of questions...
This article is over 10 years old and may contain outdated information

It was one of those brilliantly constructed scenes for which Naughty Dog is so well known. If you played the Left Behind DLC for the award-winning The Last Of Us, you might know what I’m talking about.

Recommended Videos

Remember that scene where Ellie impulsively kisses her female friend, Riley? It looked like she landed on the lips, which has created quite a bit of controversy. Is Ellie gay? Bisexual? Confused? What?

Well, the developers have responded to the cacophony, and they’ve done so in fine fashion in my opinion. During a recent GameSpot interview, game director Bruce Straley had the perfect reply:

“It’s like ‘who cares?’ A good character is a good character and that’s what we’re after.”

“It’s like ‘who cares?’ A good character is a good character and that’s what we’re after.”

Creative director Neil Druckmann said they’ve received a great reaction regarding Ellie’s character in the game. Before the title released, many gamers figured Ellie was purely a support character, and she’d only be involved in a few escort missions. Of course, as everyone now knows, Ellie is a huge part of the story.

But Druckmann said the team’s writers “didn’t set out to make a statement,” and they really just wanted to create a fantastic character. Well, they did exactly that.

That is the only correct response

I’m only going to say this once: If you’re putting in a certain “kind” of character purely for the sake of a “statement,” which means there are extenuating political or social reasons, you’re doing a disservice to art. The sexuality of a character should be completely irrelevant, as should race and gender. The way to make it irrelevant is not to cram it down our throats under the guise of “tolerance.” That does nothing.

Give the artist full creative freedom to convey his vision. If that story requires a gay character, fine. On the other hand, if you invented a story for the express purpose of using a gay character, your agenda infects the product. It means the expression didn’t come first; the sociology or politics came first. Such things can and do have a place in all forms of art, but they should never be the top priority of any artist.

In short–good for you, Naughty Dog.


GameSkinny is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Fathoms_4209
Fathoms_4209
A gaming journalism veteran of 14 years, a confirmed gamer for over 30 years, and a lover of fine literature and ridiculously sweet desserts.