Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Does Civ 6 need expansions to be as good as Civ 5?

Does Civilization 6 Need Expansions to Beat Civ 5?

Does Civ 6 need expansions to be as good as Civ 5?
This article is over 8 years old and may contain outdated information

To many people, Civilization 5 paled to Civ 4 until the expansions came out (Gods & Kings, but notably Brave New World). And now that Civilization 6 is out, there’s a new comparison to make. Does Civ 6 similarly need expansions to beat Civ 5?

Recommended Videos

In a word: No.

Will there be expansions? Undoubtedly. They will add to the game by at least putting some new civilizations, but might even add a few more mechanics, or perhaps adjusting some existing ones. But even without any expansions or updates, Civ 6 is already as good — if not better — than Civ 5.

Civilization 5 was the first in the series to use hexagonal tiles (instead of the square tiles used in previous versions). This in itself was a huge change in not just aesthetics, but military strategy. However, it took out or changed many of the mechanics that Civ 4 and its expansions had, such as religion and espionage.

Civ 6 is similarly a whole new ball game from Civ 5. Although it still uses hexagonal tiles, it was developed from scratch with a new game engine. Mechanics aside, you can immediately spot the difference in the interface alone. The menus are sleeker in Civ 6, and the game screen is very ‘map-centric’ in that city details are overlays rather than new screens.

Although Civ 6 hasn’t taken any mechanics away from Civ 5 (like Civ 5 did with Civ 4), it has changed them significantly. But how has it done that? See the handy chart below:

 
Civ 5
Civ 6

Workers

Workers were immortal, 1 could last the entire game; built roads and improvements Called Builders now. Have 3 charges to improve with, then disappear. Do not build roads.

Roads

Workers built roads, took time and roads cost upkeep Roads are automatically built by Trade caravans between the cities they trade with; no upkeep.

Religion

A few religious units that either spread religion or safeguarded against it Several units that spread or eliminate religion, plus religious warfare that is not tied to political warfare.

Espionage

Spies were sent to enemy cities for missions, held back for various boosts, or sent to home cities to counter other spies Spies are sent to cities like before, but counter-espionage missions have to be reestablished after about 4 turns. Also, counter-espionage only covers the district you send it to and it’s surrounding adjacent districts, and only for about 4 turns.

Diplomacy

Each civilization had its leader and that leader had 1 AI ‘play style’ which was fairly consistent with each game Each civilization has its leader. That leader has a known agenda, but also a secret randomized agenda

There’s a lot more to the mechanics than shown here, but the key point is that Civ 6 brings as much as Civ 5 did with all its expansions, despite the changes.  

Any expansions that come for Civ 6 will not only add to the game that we have now, but could possibly change it in ways we can’t imagine, just as the previous Civ‘s expansions did for them. 

What do you think? Does Civilization 6 live up to its predecessor, even without the expansions to come? Let me know in the comments!


GameSkinny is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of void.presence
void.presence
You don't stop playing games because you get old, you get old because you stop playing games. I'm what you might call an 'avid casual gamer,' that is, I love games, and I play a lot of them, but I'm not too good at them and there are quite a few games that I love that I've never actually finished. I'm a PC gamer as well as an XBox One gamer. I'm not into the Playstation side at all, but I'm the LAST person to promote console wars.